al-Nakba: the Palestinian "Catastrophe"

Ironic, how quickly innocent victims can become ruthless victimizers

Home

Why focus on Israel?

Do Jews need a state?

Index of topics

Who are we?

Our directors

Our methods

Community actions

Sponsored events

Community television

Using the internet

News & Views

Our ongoing commentaries

Palestine: Just Justice!

Balfour Declaration

UN partition resolution

UN Charter

Universal Human Rights

VFP resolutions

The Zionist project

Origins: 1948

UN terrorism chronology

UN resolution 194

Israel founding document

US recognition

Admission to UN

"A land without a people"

Pix of Arab life before

Pix of Arab life after

Jewish refugees

1967 war

Admission of deceit

USS Liberty

UN Resolution 242

1973 Yom Kippur War

The Samson Option

Arab oil embargo

Invasions of Lebanon

1982

2006

al-Nakba continuing

Memoricide

Cultural strangulation

Land theft & destruction

Jewish National Fund

Israeli massacres

Extrajudicial actions

Killing the children

4th Geneva Convention

UN resolutions

US enabling

The Lobby

The soft lobby

duplicitous media

Resistance

Palestinian terrorism

1st intifada

2nd intifada

Jenin

Spirit of resistance

Attacks on internationals

an Apartheid state

Israeli racism

Israeli laws

Occupied Palestine

Israeli self-destruction

Solutions

Counter-Zionism

2-state model

The "peace process"

Peace process products

1-state model

a 2-stage model

a 12-step model

Right of Return

Arab Peace Initiative

Beyond Zionism

non-violent force fields

The MLK method

local activism

Sources & resources

web sites

books and videos

The Arab Peace Initiative was first proposed in 2002 by Saudi Arabia at the Beirut Summit of the Arab League and re-endorsed at the Riyadh Summit in 2007.

It offers peace and normalized relations between the entire Arab region and Israel, in exchange for complete Israeli withdrawal from the occupied territories including East Jerusalem, as required by UNSC Resolution 242, and a "just settlement" of the Palestinian refugee crisis "in conformity with (UN) Resolution 194."

Hamas had reservations and abstained on these votes but said it would not oppose a plan adopted by the Arab League and accepted by Israel. On December 1, 2010, the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz reported Hamas leader Ismail Haniyea’s agreement to honor the Arab League plan if endorsed by a Palestinian referendum including all Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza and the diaspora.

It is unlikely that a Palestinian plurality will accept any "final status agreement" that evades their right of return. In April 2009 - soon after Cast Lead, when occupied and blockaded Palestinians would predictably have been highly motivated to find a solution - a One Voice survey of Israelis and Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank found that refugee rights were rated a "very significant" issue by 95% of Palestinians and only 25% of Israelis. This same survey found 87% of Palestinian respondents rating the "Right of return AND compensation" as "essential" to a solution.

Including the diaspora, some 4½ million Palestinians have UN-registered property claims against Israel, supported by Articles 13 and 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UN Resolution 194, and Israel’s own pledge as a condition of its 1949 admission to the UN.  This pledge has remained unfulfilled for over six decades. 

Israel's pledge to internationalize Jerusalem - a second condition of its UN admission - also remains unfulfilled. This probably still represents the best solution to the Jerusalem dispute, designating the city as an international historic site sacred to the three Abrahamic religions and administered by the United Nations.

Israel has privately rejected and formally ignored the Arab initiative and instead has maintained a holding pattern through the pretense of a "peace process" while continuing to expand its West Bank settlements, undermine the elected Palestinian government of Hamas and split the Palestinian resistance, corrupt the PA in Ramallah, lay siege to Gaza, and confiscate Palestinian properties in East Jerusalem. This pattern has faithfully followed the game plan advised by PM Ariel Sharon in 2000 to seize as much land as possible as long as they can get away with it.

Having achieved treaties with immediate neighbors Egypt and Jordan under heavy US foreign aid incentives, and with the Gulf states controlled by US oil interests, few viable adversaries remained and these were immediately targeted for "regime change" by the neoconservative-controlled first Bush administration. As reported at that time by General Wesley Clark from his Pentagon conversations, targeted regimes included Iraq, Iran, Libya, Sudan, Syria and Lebanon. Only some have oil, but all share the common features of unfriendliness to Israel and freedom from US control.

Holding these cards and dealing from a stacked deck, Israel saw no need to cede any land for peace. However, with only Iraq neutralized by the Bush administration, Lebanon successfully resisting Israeli aggression in 2006, and an Arab uprising underway in 2011 including removal of Mubarek in Egypt, Israel may now be reconsidering its options. 


Demand Freedom, Justice and Equality in the Holy Land